The Admission
Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth told employees on June 2 that morale at the company is "probably one of the worst it's ever been" — a striking acknowledgment from a senior executive at a company that just posted one of its strongest quarters on record.
Speaking during an internal "Tuesdays With Boz" session, Bosworth placed the current moment just below the Cambridge Analytica scandal — when up to 87 million Facebook users' data was harvested without consent — in terms of internal damage. "Maybe not the worst it's ever been in 20 years here, but it's probably up there," he said.
Meta declined to comment further to Fast Company.
What Actually Happened to the Workforce
The proximate cause is a restructuring that hit employees on two fronts simultaneously. Last month, Meta cut 10% of its workforce. At the same time, it reassigned another 10% of staff to mandatory AI teams tasked with training its models — a move that generated significant internal backlash.
In April, employees pushed back against a separate practice: Meta's use of mouse-tracking software to collect behavioral data for AI training. Workers circulated an online petition and posted flyers across U.S. offices. The resistance was organized enough to be visible, which is notable at a company that has historically maintained tight internal culture controls.
The Compensation Gap
The financial context makes the morale problem harder to dismiss as sentiment. Meta reported $56.31 billion in Q1 revenue — a 33% year-over-year increase — and nearly $26.8 billion in profit. Meanwhile, median total compensation fell from $417,400 in 2024 to $388,200, and the stock portion of annual raises was cut by 5%.
That divergence — record profits, declining pay — is the kind of incentive misalignment that doesn't resolve itself through memos. Employees on the anonymous workplace platform Blind have been explicit: posts with negative sentiment about AI at Meta reached 83% since late 2025, up roughly 300% from 2024, when 20% of AI-related posts were negative. "Meta is dead and depressing," one user wrote after the layoff announcements.
Bosworth's Fix
In a memo titled "Back to Day 1," Bosworth outlined a set of structural and cultural changes. Managers will be capped at 20 direct reports. The number of times employees are shuffled to new managers during restructurings will be limited. Leadership has committed to better explaining strategic shifts before they happen.
Bosworth also acknowledged that Meta's "boom/bust cycle of hiring left entire teams in the lurch" — a candid admission that the company's workforce planning created the instability it is now trying to repair.
On the softer end: improved break areas, increased travel budgets, and more spending on social events.
The Underlying Bet
None of this changes the core strategic direction. Meta plans to spend up to $145 billion on AI infrastructure this year. Bosworth's memo echoed a line now common across the industry: "AI won't take your job, but someone who knows AI might."
That framing puts the burden of adaptation on employees while the company controls the pace and terms of the transition. The question Bosworth's memo doesn't answer is what Meta is offering workers who adapt successfully — beyond the promise of psychological safety and a better snack selection.